You can tell Islamophobes lack sophistication and are superficial in their approach to research and analysis of historical events. For them it’s just a case of running with isolated truths and using those such isolated truths as the foundation for their propaganda. Effectively they heap manure on a lawn.
Here’s the Hitler picture which Islamophobes use in their quest to convince the hateful and naïve of their wishful parallelisms between Nazism and Muslims.
That’s a Muslim meeting Hitler – a picture which Islamophobes pass around in their attempts to malign Muslims. Every picture has a story, what’s the real story behind the Mufti of Palestine and Hitler? Read on and you will see a ton of Islamophobic hypocrisy and misrepresentation exposed!
This highlights the utter hypocrisy and the dark propaganda machine of the Zionists.
And Skurnik was not the only Jew fighting on the side of the Germans. More than 300 found themselves in league with the Nazis when Finland, who had a mutual enemy in the Soviet Union, joined the war in June 1941.
What am I talking about? I’m talking about 2 groups fighting FOR Hitler – 1 group is vilified, besmirched and even used to smear the religion of that group and to tarnish all the co-religionists of this group whilst the 2nd group who fought for Hitler are not even mentioned widely (until now) and when they are mentioned their circumstances are explained with balance, empathy and context
So here we have a group of Finnish Jews who fought FOR Hitler yet they are not vilified whilst the Mufti of Jerusalem who sided with Hitler is unfairly presented in an unbalanced and negative light by the Zionists’ propaganda machine. Interesting.
It gets even more interesting; the reason why the Mufti and the Finnish Jews chose to side with Hitler was because they had a common enemy (the British for the Mufti and the Russians for the Finnish Jews).
So why the hypocrisy? Why have the Zionists, for years, publicised the actions of the Mufti, ignored the context and presented him to be an ogre when he was only looking to oppose a common enemy (the British who had occupied his land) WHILST doing a combination of ignoring, understanding, contextualising the actions of the Finnish Jews who sided with Hitler for the same reason (a common enemy)? Why one rule for the Muslim and another for the Jew? Zionist propaganda!
Here is a post which I produced some time ago concerning the Zionist misuse of the actions of the Mufti of Jerusalem:
|Bishop Friedrich Coch saluting Hitler in 1933|
Anti-Muslim propaganda has no regard for humanity, context and truth. Of course it serves the interests of the Zionists, rogue Christian missionaries and the extreme far-right to portray Muslims as folk who are ready to butcher innocent Jews at the drop of a hat. This bout of anti-Muslim propaganda also distorts history and context with regards to Hajj Amin al-Hussaini (Mufti of Jerusalem).
The interesting thing here is, those very advocates of this propaganda against Muslims re the Mufti of Jerusalem’s support of Hitler do not bat an eye-lid when it comes to Italy, the home of the Vatican (the centre of Catholic Christianity) nor do they bother to ponder upon Protestant Christian Germany which was the birthplace of Martin Luther (who initiated the Protestant Reformation). We could find a ton of Christians who sided with Nazi Germany at one point in time. Would it be fair to label these folk as Jew-hating racists? No.
Having said, the Islamophobes pluck out the example of the Mufti of Jerusalem without offering any context and even offering deception. Right wing propaganda is geared towards people who are bigoted in some capacity, poorly educated and/or those who have little inclination to research further – that’s the right-wing in a nutshell.
Why did the Mufti of Jerusalem side with Hitler against Britain and the Allies?
The answer is partly in the question: ‘Britain’. Britain had occupied the Arab territories (specifically Palestine) for decades at that time. There was a growing Zionist movement which was pushing for a Zionist stateas well as a growing Arab nationalist movement which championed a Palestinian state.
The Mufti, seeing that Britain (the country occupying his land) was at war with Germany, chose a side – he chose Germany. Think about it, this seemed to be an opportunity for him to free his people of British hegemony and realise the Arab Nationalist movement’s goal of a Palestinian state. There was no anti-Jewish motivation.
In fact he even told local Jews that he had no enmity towards them:
For more examples of Muslims saving Jews during World War II, please see:
Quotes in red from, Islam: Silencing the Critics, Zia Sheikh, 2nd Edition, 2012
Yes, the Mufti of Jerusalem did side with Hitler’s Germany (just like millions of Christians in Italy and Germany) but the Mufti did not side with Hitler for reasons of anti-Semitism. He wanted freedom from British rule and a Palestinian state – this was his motivation in siding with Germany. He was even on record telling local Jews he had no enmity towards them – his enemy was Britain and Zionism (there are a number of Jews who oppose Zionism)
One wonders why the Islamophobes don’t make mention of such. Intellectual dishonesty, deception, spin and distortion of facts are the hallmarks of Islamophobes who want folk to hate Muslims.
My message to the Islamophobes and those who in contact with their material is, think and research!
Jesus taught people to do the Will of God (according to Mark 3:35) in order to become his brothers, mothers or sisters. A Muslim means one who submits to the Will of God. Do you want to become a brother of Jesus? If yes, become a Muslim. Now is the time.
Learn about Islam: