David Wood of Answering Muslims

Honked Dave’s Nose at AnsweringMuslims.com

UPDATE: David Wood had a Bowel Movement.

So I left a comment (see below) on his blog and he got all upset and then ran with some of his already-refuted nonsense about eternal erections – that stuff was refuted LAST week in this video (Dave get with the program you and your buddies were spectacularly rebuked):

David Wood and his Creepy Buddies

A message I left David Wood (don’t expect it to show up on there – that man’s bowels move rapidly when he hears of somebody exposing him):

Hi Dave

It is I, Yahya Snow!

Try not to soil your pants Dave – I have NOT released another post rebuking your stupidity (yet:)) so need to panic.

Just letting you know it’s posts like these why people like Negeen have left your cabal.
In your radicalized mind this bloke sexually abused simply because he was a Muslim.

I am not too sure who is the bigger fool you or Sam:

Don’t panic Dave, the above link is due about Sam. Well actually it’s 100% proof the man is a fool.
I hope you didn’t soil your pants. If you did feel free to print out your blog posts and use them to help clean yourself.

Oh can I have confirmation Mary Jo Sharpe has left your band of stupidity too?

I guess you don’t really care as Negeen and Mary were hardly people who gave you cash – guess they were too bright for that. Step forward useful fools such as Radical Moderate.

Dave, don’t you not feel guilty in profiteering from a bloke (Radical Moderate) who from my understand has no job. Why are other people’s welfare cheques paying for you to scour the net for negative stories of Muslims and post them.

Do you really need to be paid for that. Try getting a job…a proper job.

I bid you farewell with that stern message. Hope it gets through to you.

I do hope your bowels didn’t go into over-drive.

I bid you good day!!!

Think about it Dave. Time to leave the £$£$ of the anti-Muslim bandwagon.

For those followers of David Wood who are sick and tired of his featuring of negative news stories of Muslims:

Are you a former supporter of David Wood? If so email me your story:

Email: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk

William Lane Craig Doubts the Biggest Resurrection story in the Bible: http://thefactsaboutislam.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/william-lane-craig-doubts-resurrection.html

Trinity not in OT:

A video for Sam seen as he’s creeping around here – A lesson in true scholarship http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjL_epSmfTI&lc=gaD1vcXzFkDRxLF48m7kl66laZ-iSa5Aomn5b1CquqY


Sunday, 7 July 2013

Silly ABN Christian Arguments against Muslim Beliefs of Paradise


Paradise is Physical and Spiritual

This video covers the myth some Christian missionaries present and/or perpetuate of the Muslim belief in Paradise being solely physical. This of course is incorrect, for a Muslim the greatest pleasure is that of seeing Allah. Being in the presence of Allah and being able to see him is a spiritual experience which we should all strive for. For a Muslim, in this life, the spirituality of praying to Allah is unrivalled even in this world – our favourite food and other activities cannot beat the experience Muslims feel when worshipping God in this life. So why should anybody think that the physical would surpass the spiritual in Heaven? It won’t.

Sex in Paradise

The video also covers the inconsistent attacks of the Muslim belief that sex is something that does occur in Paradise. For some reason this is a chief objection by Christians – perhaps some use it in a disingenuous fashion to portray Muslims in a manner akin to the sexually-negative portrayals Christian orientalists of the past did. The video expands on Dr Shabir Ally’s teachings of there being nothing wrong with sex in Paradise and that it actually helps Muslims to abstain from illicit sexual intercourse in this life.

Dr Shabir Ally makes the point that those who do not believe sex is not something they will experience in Paradise are more likely to fall into the pitfall of adultery and/or fornication (sexual sins). Dr Ally’s claims are actually backed up by statistics where it is shown 80% of young evangelical Christians in America engage in sex before marriage whilst a recent study has shown Muslims to be the best behaved with it comes to sex out of all the major faith groups:



Christian missionaries need to stop with such lines of argumentation, try thinking and reflecting upon Muslim teachings and argumentations. If you do so genuinely you will realise the Muslim has the stronger argumentation.

Jesus has Muslim brothers/sisters
The incarnation?
Original sin?
Learn about Islam

Feedback: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk


Saturday, 22 June 2013

Learn Quranic Arabic Schools Islamophobe David Wood (Does the Quran teach the sun sets in a murky pool of water? No)

This is getting absolutely ridiculous; the huge number of internet  critics of Islam just latching onto old, tired and refuted allegations against Islam.

The Islamophobes blindly follow the material on their anti-muslim websites and claim the Quran (18:86) teaches the sun sets in a pool of muddy water. This is untrue; these Islamophobes don’t know Arabic and nor do they even bother to check to see if this claim has already been answered – it’s been answered many, many times over by Muslims (they make themselves look even more foolish due to the plethora of refutations of this specific claim available free on the net).

Until, when he reached the setting place of the sun, he found it setting in a spring of black muddy (or hot) water. And he found near it a people. We (Allâh) said (by inspiration): “O Dhul-Qarnain! Either you punish them, or treat them with kindness.” [18:86 English translation of the meanings by Dr Mohsin]

Here we see an internet charlatan (who makes a living out of this) rehashing this claim and making himself look ignorant and foolish in the process – not to mention misleading his Christian audience.

Does the Sun set in murky water? David Wood vs LQA

If the video does not play, please see:

This David Wood fella actually gets donations ($1000s) for regurgitating material he has seen on anti-Muslim websites despite not knowing Arabic nor being educated in Islam. The David Wood section focusses on rebuking, refuting and ridiculing this charlatan:

Note: The ignoramus mentions Alexander the Great as Dhul Qarnain in the video. The Quran does not specify who Dhul Qarnain is.

Learn about or convert to Islam:

Posted by at 17:23

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

Refuted: Pagan Origins of Islamic Practices (+ Christian Practices and Beliefs Discussed)

This Christian missionary (David Wood)seems to have taken his claims about Islam right off a dodgy missionary website before airing them on an internet evangelical Christian TV show (ABN Sat). Looking beyond this man’s amateurism let’s look at his claims; his claims are refuted in the video and questions are raised about Christian practices and beliefs which are linked to pagans.

‘Pagan Practices in Islam’ (A Powerful Response to ABN)

This Christian falls into error as he is unaware that the Islamic practices and revered places/objects that he mentions are in fact linked back to Abraham (p) thus are in fact monotheistic. Abraham built the Kaba and worshipped God there. Thus, worshipping God at the Kaba is Abrahamic and monotheistic NOT pagan.

The Christian in the video (David Wood) is confused as AFTER the passing on of Abraham and Ishmael (p) later generations in the vicinity of the Kaba took up idol worship and thus became pagans but also maintained some Abrahamic practices. These Abrahamic practices were restored back to a complete monotheistic way with the coming of Islam.

Hajj (the pilgrimage) was revealed by God and was proclaimed by Abraham. Circumambulation was mentioned by God to Abraham (see Quran 22:26-27)

Kissing the black stone (which Abraham used as a cornerstone for the Kaba) is something Muslims do as it’s the sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (p). It’s not a pagan practice.

The Christian practices and beliefs we highlighted to have pagan roots

Easter: As Christianity spread into Europe different Pagan customs blended into the holidays. It’s actually thought the word ‘Easter’ may have come from Eostre (a Pagan goddess of Spring and fertility. Jesus never celebrated Easter nor ever taught anybody to do such.

Easter Eggs: Eggs have been mythological symbols of birth for thousands of years. Christians adopted the egg as an Easter custom around the 13th century. Jesus never taught this practice of the Easter egg – he never practiced such.

Easter Bunny: The rabbit had long been a symbol of fertility and new life in European pagan customs. Christians adopted the rabbit around the 16th century.

Bunnies are a leftover from the pagan festival of Eostre, a great northern goddess whose symbol was a rabbit or hare http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/apr/03/easter-pagan-symbolism

The cross: The cross is something that is believed to have originated from the ankh:

The Ankh is commonly known to mean life in the language of Ancient Kemet (land of the Blacks) renamed Egypt by the Greeks. It is also a symbol for the power to give and sustain life, the Ankh is typically associated with material things such as water(which was believed by Egyptians to regenerate life), air, sun, as well as with the[ir] gods, who are frequently pictured carrying an Ankh.
The Egyptian king is often associated with the Ankh also, either in possession of an Ankh (providing life to his people) or being given an Ankh (or stream of Ankhs) by the[ir] gods. http://theafrocentricexperience.com/index.phpoption=com_content&view=article&id=86&Itemid=125

Jesus never wore a cross nor taught people to wear such crosses.

Christmas: Christians celebrate this in the winter (December) despite knowing Jesus was not born in the winter. This celebration is linked to the winter solstice which the nature worshippers observed.

The Trinity: This is a belief that Jesus nor any other Prophet taught. It’s thought this belief in the trinity was due to Graeco-Roman (pagan) influence. Islam is bringing people back to the original message of the Prophets.

Please, if you love the Prophets and want to follow their teachings look into Islam:

Umar Lee Leaves Christianity and Comes to Islam

Email: yahyasnow@yahoo.co.uk


Sunday, 9 June 2013

Was Prophet Muhammad Guaranteed Paradise? Yes! (ABNSat Christian Missionary Deceptions Cleared Up)

Have you ever heard the Christian missionary argument against Islam which goes  ‘Muhammad did not know whether he will be in Heaven or not’?

It’s an odd claim. Think about it; they are asking us to believe that Prophet Muhammad (p) the Messenger of God may not be in Heaven (Paradise)!

Well, don’t think about it any further. It’s a false claim. It’s just another inaccurate Christian missionary claim in order to convert Muslims to Christianity!

The reality is Prophet Muhammad is the first one to enter Paradise. Prophet Muhammad (p) said: I will come to the gate of Paradise on the Day of Resurrection and will ask for it to be opened. The gatekeeper will say, “Who are you” I will say “Muhammad.” He will say, “I was told about you and that I was not to open the gate for anyone before you.”

Sadly we have Christians who present themselves as experts on Islam despite having no qualifications and being unable to read Arabic. You do wind up thinking if it’s all about cash. I hope the ABN Christian missionary featured in this video will apologise and just realise that trying to make cash and seek fame from feigning expertise on Islam is not the way to live life.

See this video for the proofs that Prophet Muhammad will be in Paradise and watch the ABN Christian missionary get refuted spectacularly:

A few extra points

Sahih Bukhari Volume 8, Book 73, Number 34:
Narrated Sahl bin Sa’d:
The Prophet said, “I and the person who looks after an orphan and provides for him, will be in Paradise like this,” putting his index and middle fingers together.

Thus Muhammad is CONFIRMING he will be IN Paradise (and those Muslims looking after orphans will be very close to him in Paradise). Anybody of a reasonable disposition will acknowledge this points to Muhammad being GUARANTEED Paradise and SALVATION!

PS The video explains why Christian missionaries make the argument, i.e. how they get confused on this issue. If the video does not play, please see here:


Bible manuscript discoveries:


Sunday, 2 June 2013

Careful, they may start calling you Scam $hamoun (Two Islamophobes Jump on the Book Bandwagon and want Cash)

Sam Shamoun has wasted over a decade of his life with his internet antagonism of Muslims, this decade or so has seen him transform into a family man – he has a wife and children now.

With such responsibilities come the need for money. The normal course of action would be to get a job but Shamoun persists with his internet activity relying on handouts/donations from folk on paltalk, facebook and other such places.

Clearly, the man is collecting enough cash to support his family; unless he is on the welfare system and/or sending his wife out to work whilst he harasses and abuses young Muslims on the net.

The Plan

Sam Shamoun’s plan seems to be to pursue his career in Christian apologetics along with his buddy David Wood of Acts 17. Ever since Dr Nabeel Qureshi bailed on Acts 17 it seems they have been like two peas in a pod. It also seems the drive for donations has been ratcheted up recently. I guess sicne there’s a ton of folk out there who know Islamophobia is a business the ‘market’ has been flooded. It’s not like Shamoun and Wood have any expertise to set them apart from the average Islamophobe with google, a website/blog and YouTube channel in tow, is there? I mean none of them know Arabic, neither have any qualifications in ANY Islamic discipline and nor are they respected amongst the Muslim community.

How does one Islamophobe seeking fame and cash set him/herself apart from the rest in a crowded market?

The ‘models’ in the industry of Islamophobia (for the Isamophobes) would no doubt be those with the biggest profiles (and bank balances as a result). You have folk who claim they are ‘ex Muslim’ which seperates them from the rest. A woman claiming herself to be ex-Muslim such as Wafa Sultan and Ayan Hirsi Ali would certainly stand out and grab a load of traction and ‘work’.

Shamoun and Wood are not former Muslims and nor are the women (Wood’s cross-dressing does not qualify him to use female changing rooms or bathrooms – he’s not a female!).

Then there’s the so called ex-terrorists who seem to be raking it in – Kamal Saleem and Walid Shoebat. It’s a bit late for Shamoun and Wood to claim they were recruited as terrorists for Mossad (oops I mean Hamas).

So who is left? Possibly the most infamous of them all (and the richest?), Robert Spencer. He wrote a book attacking Prophet Muhammad (his book has been refuted chapter for chapter – see Moustafa Zayed’s book, The Lies About Muhammad).

No prizes in guessing what Sam and Dave are planning to do? Yep write a book or two or three. Not original. It’s already been done before – many times over.

How Predictable: Islamophobes Wanting to CASH in by Writing Books about Islam

However, it seems their venture to write a book is already bringing in the cash (KERCHING!!!). They have started asking for cash to cover their expenses whilst they write the book/s. What stuck out to me is that Sam Shamoun does his internet thing FULL TIME. He is ALREADY dependent on donations so for Dave to be asking on behalf of Sam Shamoun raises a few questions.

Further still, Shamoun in writing a book does not need to expend much time at all. He’s been doing this for over a decade now and one would suspect that he would just make a sloppy hodge-podge of his old (already-refuted) tomes and present it as a book.

Shameless and Arrogant

In the video David Wood claims the best books on Islam are waiting to be written suggesting he and his other donation-seeking buddy are going to write one of the better books despite not knowing Arabic and having no qualifications at all. Contrast this with the world-renowned authorities who have written books on Islamic subjects who are respected in the field of academics – some of whom have legacies spanning centuries.

The amateurs with Google are taking over the field of academia? No, the lunatics are not taking over the asylum. These folk are simply living in a hubris on the net. Time to turn the computer off and get real jobs lads!

PS Are these two donation-seeking wannabe-authors going to split the profits of any book sales with those who give them cash now? I doubt it. Surely only when Islamophobia and rampant Christian fundamentalism merge do we get amateurs being given cash to write about Islam. That speaks volumes.


Explaining the ‘Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin’ hadith MINUS the Christian missionary desperation

There’s a fair few disingenuous Christians (and folk of other faith persuasions) who are erroneously attempting to present the following hadith as racist:

Listen and obey (your chief) even if an Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin were made your chief

Actually, if people stopped to think they would realise this hadith shows the opposite of racism and even destroys racism against our black brothers and sisters. Think about it, the hadith is telling you that you must obey your leader regardless of his colour. From it we derive that there is nothing wrong with black people assuming leadership roles. In the Christian West black people have really struggled against institutional racism and are still struggling against it today, yet here roughly 1400 years ago we have the Prophet of God destroying institutional racism.

The fruit of Islam is black imams, scholars and leaders as well as inter-racial marriages and mixed race children. Do these folk even know that one of the imams of the Grand Mosque in Makkah is black. Let me put it to you again, the imam of the holiest place in Islam is black (Sheik Adil Kalbani). It’s through Islam that black people are allowed to flourish and have flourished in the past. Here are a couple of quotes from an interview with the imam:

“Our Islamic history has so many famous black people,” said the imam, as he sat leaning his arm on a cushion in the reception room of his home. “It is not like the West.”

“Any qualified individual, no matter what his color, no matter where from, will have a chance to be a leader, for his good and his country’s good.”


Going back to the hadith, Shadid Lewis (a black American convert to Islam) explains the hadith in the video. The likening to the head as a raisin was descriptive and had no intention of racism. As Shadid Lewis points out, some Afro-hair can appear in the likeness of raisin/s with tight curls. My personal view is that this comment differentiating or specifying  the Ethiopians based on their appearance may have had something to do with the class divide in Ethiopian societies (as well as the societies that had Ethiopians residing therein).

We know Ethiopia was a kingdom at that time so there would have been a class divide – the lower class Ethiopians may have had their hair in a certain style that was likened to a raisin. Another interesting point, Shadid also points out that the Hadith mentions Ethiopians and not black people specifically.

However, the main idea one comes away with once thinking about the hadith and all the excellent work Prophet Muhammad did to fight discrimination against black people is that there was no racist intent in the comment at all and it is a comment that opposes racism.

We have a statement (the hadith) which is destroying institutional racism yet mischievous Islamophobes (many of which are Christian missionaries desperate to prevent black Christians from converting to Islam) have disingenuously presented it as a racist hadith.

Perhaps the negative and deceptive spin these two Christian missionaries put on to this hadith reflects some sort of anti-black prejudice on THEIR part!

Anybody with any sort of scholarship and/or insight into Islam will know Prophet Muhammad was not racist. Sadly the two Christians (David Wood and Sam Shamoun) in this video have no regard for scholarship and accuracy here:

From Prophet Muhammad we realise racism is ‘ignorance’.

Muslims believe there were black Prophets (in fact Prophets of every skin colour) as Allah (God) sent warners to every nation.

Prophet Muhammad had many black friends (who are loved in Islam), approved marriages between Black and Arab, the first muezzin (caller to prayer – which is a very important and honourable role in Islam) was indeed a black man (Bilal) and the Prophet’s nurse was Abyssinian (Umm Aymen)

Did Paul have any such relationships with black people? Did Mark, Matthew, Luke and John ever meet a black person never mind befriend and love them (like Prophet Muhammad did)?

From the New Testament, The Ethiopian eunuch seems to be the first black person to become a Christian – at the hands of Philip [Acts 8:26-40]. There are very few details about this man. In fact Philip disappears after the Ethiopian’s baptism.

For me, this is another sign that Prophet Muhammad (p) is indeed the Last Messenger of God. Surely the last Messenger of God would have had such fine teachings concerning race and relations with black people especially since they are indeed generally the most victimised when it comes to race in the history of mankind.

Also see the post on the Christian claim of seeing a black woman in your dream means an epidemic


Wednesday, 29 May 2013

Exposed: Christians Claim Prophet Muhammad was Racist!

American Christians are seeing many African-American brothers and sisters leaving Christianity for Islam. What is the response of these Christians? To lie and attempt to present Prophet Muhammad (p) as racist!

Anybody with any sort of scholarship and/or insight into Islam will know Prophet Muhammad was not racist

From Prophet Muhammad we realise racism is ‘ignorance’.

Muslims believe there were black Prophets (in fact Prophets of every skin colour) as Allah (God) sent warners to every nation.

Prophet Muhammad had many black friends (who are loved in Islam), approved marriages between Black and Arab, the first muezzin (caller to prayer) was indeed a black man (Bilal) and the Prophet’s nurse was Abyssinian (Umm Aymen)

Did Paul have any such relationships with black people? Did Mark, Matthew, Luke and John ever meet a black person never mind befriend and love them (like Prophet Muhammad did)?

From the New Testament, The Ethiopian eunuch seems to be the first black person to become a Christian – at the hands of Philip [Acts 8:26-40]. There are very few details about this man. In fact Philip disappears after the Ethiopian’s baptism.

For me, this is another sign that Prophet Muhammad (p) is indeed the Last Messenger of God. Surely the last Messenger of God would have had such fine teachings concerning race and relations with black people especially since they are indeed generally the most victimised when it comes to race in the history of mankind.

Christian Missionary Desperate Smear Campaign

Sadly, for these Christians the truth is of no concern; these folk have an agenda and they work it assiduously.

If the video does not play, please see:

In this video, the Christians misrepresent a dream interpretation. This is the dream interpretation they misrepresent:

Volume 9, Book 87, Number 161:

Narrated ‘Abdullah:
The Prophet said, “I saw (in a dream) a black woman with unkempt hair going out of Medina and settling at Mahai’a, i.e., Al-Juhfa. I interpreted that as a symbol of epidemic of Medina being transferred to that place (Al-Juhfa).”

The Assyrian Christian LIES and claims Muhammad said ‘if you have a dream of a black woman that is a sign of an epidemic’!

The Christian must have thought African-Americans are stupid or something; I mean there’s no way somebody balanced is going to come away believing these desperate Christians after reading about Prophet Muhammad (p) and the hadith above. It’s obvious the hadith above is related to that SPECIFIC hadith and Prophet Muhammad did not say ‘if you see a black woman in your dream then you will have an epidemic’ – this was a bare-faced lie by the Christian missionary who goes by the names, Sam Shamoun and Triple B. I’d like to add another name to his list, ‘liar’

The Christian even misuses Qadi Iyad’s Ash-Shifa and attempts to make a Muslim scholar appear racist. Amazingly, we have already refuted this deception before, I guess the /Christian in question had not seen our article or simply chose to ignore it to further his deceptive agrenda.

Here is the article in full:

There is a deceptive ploy on the internet which suggests Islam is racist against black people.

Those who propagate such a claim use the two narrations in Ash-Shifa of Qadi Iyad which highlights the opinion of Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman concerning those who call the Prophet Muhammad (p) black. Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman was of the opinion whoever does so should be put to death [1]

Sadly, these rabble rousers fail to mention this was the opinion of Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman and NOT of the Prophet (p).

Their deception is worse still

However, their deception gets worse as the context of the statement is omitted (though it is in the SAME segment of the book) as this statement would have been made within the back-drop of ANYBODY who alters the description of the Prophet being considered a disbeliever and even liable to execution:

Habib ibn ar-Rabi’ said that it is disbelief to alter his description and its details. The one who does that openly is an unbeliever. He is asked to repent. The one who conceals it is a heretic and is killed without being asked to repent. [2]

So we see the problem was not racism but the problem could have been that of altering the description of the Prophet.

To highlight their deception further we can look at the quote they use:

Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, Sahnun’s companion, said that whoever says that the Prophet was black is killed. The Prophet was not black [1]

However, they do not quote the paragraph immediately below which further shows the issue was not racism but the issue being, stating falsehoods which constitute denial:

Abu ‘Uthman al Haddad said something similar and said that if someone said that the Prophet died before his beard began to grow or that he was in Tahart (Morocco) and not Tihama, he is killed because this constitutes denial. [2]

Let’s be realistic

During such a time there may have been a racist undercurrent amongst the ignorant/hypocrites who used this as a slur (i.e. calling people “black”), thus Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman would have recognised the INTENT was to disparage the Prophet (p) hence his calling for the death of such folk. It is not racist on the part of Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman and it certainly has NO bearing upon Islam!

Sadly, the rabble rousers are not willing to scratch the surface or attempt to be intellectually honest – they work agendas to mud sling at Muslims and Islam.

I feel this attack against Islam is simply a devious design to stem the conversion to Islam amongst our brothers and sisters in African communities as Islam has resonated well amongst Afro-Caribbean communities in the West (and beyond) and many are leaving Christianity for the Truth of Islam.

Obviously Islam is against racism

Islam does not condone racism at all. In fact, the real criteria for judgement (in Islam) is that of conduct, NOT skin colour – this is learned through the holy Quran [3]

Muslims believe there were black Prophets (in fact Prophets of every skin colour) as Allah (God) sent warners to every nation. [4]

Muslims respect and love ALL Prophets (p). In addition, some companions of Prophet Muhammad (p) were indeed black in skin colour (the most well-known is Bilal), thus some of our saintly predecessors are indeed black!

Obviously Islam is not racist.

The Prophet considered racism as “ignorance”

When his Arab Companion Abu Dharr called Bilal ‘son of the black woman’, the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) got angry and told him: ‘You are a man who has ignorance in him.’ Abu Dharr felt such a great remorse that he put his cheek on the ground and asked Bilal to tread on his other cheek if he’d like to. [5]

Imam Shabir Ally on racism

Discover Islam

Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.com

[1] The citations Islamophobic rabble rousers are using:
Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, the companion of Sahnun, said, “Anyone who says that the Prophet was black should be killed.” (p. 375)

Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, Sahnun’s companion, said that whoever says that the Prophet was black is killed. The Prophet was not black. (p 387)

[Both from Muhammad Messenger of Allah, Ash-Shifa of Qadi ‘Iyad, Qadi ‘Iyad Musa al-Yahsubi, translated by Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley, Madinah Press Inverness, Scotland, 2004]

[2] Muhammad Messenger of Allah, Ash-Shifa of Qadi ‘Iyad, Qadi ‘Iyad Musa al-Yahsubi, translated by Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley, Madinah Press Inverness, Scotland, 2004 p387.

[3] O mankind! Lo! We have created you from male and female, and have made you nations and tribes that ye may know one another. Lo! the noblest of you, in the sight of Allah, is the best in conduct. Lo! Allah is Knower, Aware. [Pikthal’s English translation of Quran, 49:13]

[4] Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi writes:

Allah has mentioned in the Qur’an that He sent Messengers and guides among all people. Allah Almighty says: “ And verily We have raised in every nation a messenger, (proclaiming): Serve Allah and shun false gods. Then some of them (there were) whom Allah guided, and some of them (there were) upon whom error had just hold. Do but travel in the land and see the nature of the consequence for the deniers!.” (An-Nahl: 36) He Almighty also says, There was not any community except a Warner who lived among them.” (Fatir :24).

In his Musnad, Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal has stated that Allah sent 124, 000 Prophets, and from among them 315 were Messengers.

Read more: http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503543348#ixzz1CzTlNmhX

[5] In his famous Farewell Pilgrimage sermon, the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) declared: “O people! You are all to Adam and Adam was made of dust. No Arab is to be preferred over a non-Arab except by virtue of his piety.” In another hadith, he (peace and blessings be upon him) said: Allah does not look at your images or your colors but He looks at your hearts (intentions) and your deeds. Creatures are the dependants of Allah and the closest among them to Allah are indeed the most useful to His dependants.”

Read more: http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503543240#ixzz1CzbfZQdL


Thursday, 18 April 2013

How Christian Missionaries Are Answering Muslims – Tongue Sucking

It appears Islamophobic rabble-rousers on the internet have been distorting the reason behind Prophet Muhammad allowing his grandchildren (Hassan and Husayn, ra) to suck his tongue. [1]

Sadly, these folk have very little research behind them and even less desire for the truth. They have twisted these actions of genuine devotion and concern for these boys to reflect their debauched minds by accusing the Prophet of homosexuality.

Christian Missionaries Deliberately Misdirecting People

What is the actual reason behind the tongue-sucking?

The answer lies in Ash-Shifa of Qadi Iyad. The reason behind the tongue-sucking was to quench their thirst and help settle them down. We must remember this was an arid environment (desert) where water was scarce, thus loving parents/guardians did go to such lengths in caring for children:

He gave al-Hasan and al-Husayn his tongue to suck. They had been weeping from thirst and upon this they became quiet. [2]

This was a genuine act of devotion; had Jesus (p), Gandi, Guru Nanak or Mother Theresa carried out such an act of devotion to children they would have been praised for it. Sadly, this is not always the case for Prophet Muhammad (p) as malicious Islamophobes on the internet have dark agendas they are pursuing assiduously.

Outrageous Islamophobic spin on a genuine act of devotion!

Islamophobes who present Ahadith (narrations) of such a nature in order to promote the idea of homosexuality or child abuse should desist immediately as their spin amounts to nothing more than a fallacious and fanciful attempt at character assassination.

May Allah guide these people. Ameen.

Muslims and Non-Muslims should be alert…

If a hater does present a claim where this occurred between the Prophet (p) and his grandchildren or his daughter (Fatima) please realise there is nothing untoward and the action was a genuine act of devotion that any caring person would undertake for the betterment of the infants. Do not be swayed by such hollow and outrageous distortions.

We must also remember homosexuality is forbidden and sinful in Islam. [3]

The Prophet’s saliva

 Prophet even used to spit in the mouths of suckling children in order to satisfy them until nightfall [4]. Further examples of the blessings within the Prophet’s saliva are given in footnotes [5], [6].

Christian hater’s immature cross-dressing allegation is refuted

Become a Muslim today


[1] A couple of narrations Islamophobes erroneously “use” in their efforts to degrade and dehumanize the Prophet (p) and Islam:

Bukhari, 1183. It is related that Abu Hurayra said, “I never sae al-Hasan without my eyes overflowing with tears. That is because the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, went out one day and I found him in the mosque. He took my hand and I went along with him. He did not speak to me until we reached the market of Banu Qaynuqa’. He walked around it and looked. Then he left and I left with him until we reached the mosque. He sat down and wrapped himself in his garment. Then he said, ‘Where is the little one? Call the little one to me.’ Hasan came running and jumped into his lap. Then he put his hand in his beard. Then the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, opened his mouth and put his tongue in his mouth. Then he said, O Allah, I love him, so love him and the one who loves him!'” [Al-Adab al-Mufrad Al-Bukhari by Imam BukhariTranslated by: Ustadha Aisha Bewley] From – http://www.sunnipath.com/Library/Hadith/H0003P0046.aspx

Musnad Ahmed Hadith Number 16245, Volume Title: “The Sayings of the Syrians,” Chapter Title: “Hadith of Mu’awiya Ibn Abu Sufyan”: “I saw the prophet – pbuh – sucking on the tongue or the lips of Al-Hassan son of Ali, may the prayers of Allah be upon him. For no tongue or lips that the prophet sucked on will be tormented (by hell fire)

[2] Muhammad, Messenger of Allah – Ash Shifa of Qadi Iyad, translated by Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley, Madinah Press, 2004 pg 184

[3] Imam Dhahabi’s list of enormities (sins), p17.0 he writes, “…There is consensus among both Muslims and the followers of other religions that sodomy is an enormity…” [From the list of enormities presented in Nuh Hamim Keller’s translation of Umdat as Salik, Amana Publications, 2008, p17.0 (page 644)]

[4] He used to spit into the mouths of suckling children and his saliva would satisfy them until nightfall [page 184 in Ash Sifa of Qadi Iyad, Madinah Press, 2004]

[5] He spat in a well that was in Anas’ house and there was no water in Madina sweeter than it – Al Bayhaqi [from page 183 in Ash Sifa of Qadi Iyad, Madinah Press, 2004]

[6] This narration is unclear as to whether the blessings were within the saliva of the Prophet (p) or not but it is of benefit to mention:
In the hadith of Hanash ibn Uqayl we find, “The Messenger of Allah would give me a drink of sawiq (a kind of mash). He would drink first and I would drink last. I always found that it filled me up when I was hungry and quenched me when I was thirsty and was cool when I was parched”
[from page 184 in Ash Shifa of Qadi Iyad, Madinah Press, 2004]


Sunday, 7 April 2013

ABN SAT: Necrophilia and Cross Dressing (2 New Scandals)

ABN has gained an anti-Muslim and an untrustworthy reputation – it’s basically scene as a hate-fest. Here are two of their recent absurd lies. These are lies that the Christian fundamentalist (David Wood) would NEVER bring to a live debate for the fear of humiliation, yet he and his friend (Sam Shamoun) have an unchecked platform plus a desperation for viewers on Bassim Gorial’s ABN that they have been exploiting assiduously in spreading internet vile lies

ABNSat’s David Wood (with Sam Shamoun) bring ‘the sex with a dead woman’ lie

Why does Bassim Gorial give this type of hatred and deceit a platform on ABN SAT? Is it because most of his audience are anti-Muslims and anti-Islam lunatics who demand such material?

Here is a link to a past article which has already refuted this ‘sex with dead aunt claim’:


Another ABN Sat Scandal – Cross Dressing Lie

Christian fundamentalist, David Wood, presented this cross dressing lie on ABN as well as his personal YouTube channel (on which he even dressed in his wife’s nightie!):

Matthew 5:11 and Advice to Christians and Muslims

As Muslims we are facing a malicious propaganda campaign from Christian radicals. We are constantly bombarded by the most crazed insults yet we continue to hold firm. The Christian radicals direct their insults at us as their faith is questioned with our solid and more logical belief of Jesus (p) being a Prophet rather than being God. These radical Christians would do well to contemplate on Matthew 5:11

“God blesses you when people mock you and persecute you and lie about you and say all sorts of evil things against you because you are my followers. New Living Translation

We as Muslims, indeed follow the teaching of Jesus – Only God is worthy of worship.

Muslims, stay strong!

Sincere Christians, please help rebuke the mischief-makers who are attention/fame-seeking amongst your communities.

May Allah bless His Prophets further and May Allah guide us and bless us all further. Ameen.

Sunday, 31 March 2013

Cross Dressing (Another Christian Fundamentalist Lie)


Sad Cross Dresser


Right, just in case other Christian and Muslims are deceived by Christian rabble-rousers on the internet whom are propagating the cross dressing lie I think it’s time for another post on this issue.

So recently some Christian apologist donned his wife’s pink dress and put forward a video on You/tube in which he claimed Prophet Muhammed (p) wore his wife’s (Aisha’s clothing).

 This lie has already been refuted here in article form, however I did decide to pour scorn on this missionary’s cross dressing and deceptive antics via video. After producing this video I noticed Ayaman1 had already made a more thorough and comprehensive video (Did Prophet Muhammad wear his wives’ clothes? another missionary lie) in which he highlights this cloth seems to refer to ‘house’. I’d recommend, if you want to be educated on this issue you view Ayaman1’s video
 Rebuking a Cross Dresser


Recommended and Thorough Video Refutation by Ayaman1: Did Prophet Muhammad wear his wives’ clothes ? another missionary lie

Notes and Summary of Ayaman1’s Video
 Ayaman1 in his video (~4.30) brings forward a hadith from Musnad Ahmed which doesn’t use thawb or mirt (or any word related to a cloth) but uses the words (in the) HOUSE  (fi bayt…).

For me it does appear the narration refers to a house. Ayaman1 does mention the word cloth (used in the other narrations already discussued) is a metaphor for ‘house’ as well. Whatever the case may be, we are all certain NONE of the narrations refer to women’s dresses/clothing.

As for the word ‘mirT’, Ayaman1 highlights that it’s an unsewn cloth which can be worn by men and women. It’s not a dress or garment of a woman. I guess facts are what these Christian mischief-makers dislike.

In all reality, I’d imagine even the most ardent Christian fundamentalist feels these claims of cross-dressing to be false but out of sheer mischief-making and attention-seeking we see a handful of internet Christian missionary characters propagating such absurd claims. May Allah guide them. Ameen.

The ‘abomination’ that is David Wood of Acts 17 Apologetics

 This cross dresser who is collecting cash for his ‘Christian’ missionary efforts is actually an abomination according to the Bible he is claiming to preach. I wonder what his financial supporters make of this as well as Bassim Gorial (ABN), Samuel Green, James White (Alpha and Omega Ministries):

“A woman shall not wear a man’s garment, nor shall a man put on a woman’s cloak, ufor whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God. [Deuteronomyt 22:5 ESV]

Perhaps this creepy rabble-rouser will like to explain his open defiance of the Bible he is supposedly advocating…

Stupidity and Desperation

 If you are going to seek donations for your internet activities (Christian fundamentalist rabble-rousing) then surely you wearing your wife’s pink dress on camera is only going to further tarnish your credibility as an apologist (if you had any remaining)? Surely propagating a lie which you borrowed from your missionary side kick (Sam Shamoun) is hardly going to do you any favours – especially considering the lie is old, tired and refuted?

I really think Christian fundamentalists think their donors are stupid? Why else would they constantly regurgitate the same refuted absurdities over and over and present it to their financial donors as something convincing…

I think the mind set of the financial supporters of such mischief-apologists could be summed up by this fictitious dialogue:

Sam and David: Give us some support boys.

Chump 1: Here’s $50 David

Chump 2: Have you got any new material coming out?

David: What, didn’t you see me and my cross dressing video?!

Chump 1: I certainly did, you looked really pretty in the pink dress and lip stick.

Chump 2: Uh? But I saw that stupid claim years ago and Muslims refuted it easily. In fact the same goes for your other claims…

David: Do you hate Muslims? If you do, then shut your mouth and give some financial aid to your brother Sam Shamoun so he doesn’t have to get a real job.

Chump 2: Erm, guys I’m going to stop being a chump. BTW Wearing women’s clothing is an abomination according to the Bible. You David are an abomination and a deceiver. Good bye.

Chump 1: Is it possible he is a Muslim now? Shall I drink his blood?

Further reading:

Article from let me turn the tables refuting and exposing one of the original propagators of this lie:

 Did Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) cross-dress? Sam Shamoun exposed!


Monday, 1 August 2011

David Wood – Answering Oslo and Muslims Poorly

David Wood of Answering Muslims receives another spanking for his latest bout of ignorance.

It turns out Deceptive Dave was blaming Muslims for the terrorist attack on Norway. Embarrassingly for Dave, it turned out this terrorist was a Christian AND has possible links to Dave’s website!

David Wood – Answering Oslo (Brilliant Video)

Christian missionary David Wood was quick to blame Islam and Muslims for the Norway attack, even before any details about the attacker had been released.

One Islamophobe (David Wood) influences another Islamophobe (Christian terrorist Anders Berhing Breivik)?

David Wood lies about Islam and Muslims in his anti-Islam propaganda, amongst his crazy deception; he has claimed Muslims are taught to torture/kill cross-wearing Christians, carry out honour killings and perform sexual ‘thighing’ on female children as well as his standard inflammatory ‘Muslims can rape/kill you’ rhetoric.

I wonder if Ander Behring Breivik was influenced by David Wood’s anti-Islam propaganda (lies)…

Here’s a summary in the way of an imaginary conversation

David: Ah a terrorist attack in Norway. Now I get another opportunity to wade through the misery of the victims of a crime and bash Moozlims. Those donations and page views will sky rocket. If I do this long enough, I may even get as famous as my hero Robert Spencer one day.

Muslim: David, you do know the terrorist attack on Norway is not linked to Muslims…

David: That’s takiyya. Just rumours. Wait for confirmation on Pamela Geller’s blog or Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch as I get all my material from them. I bet my bottom dollar it was a Moozlim who murdered those innocent Norwegians. Stupid Moozlim. Whilst we wait I will plagiarize from Robert Spencer and google for some lurid lies about Islam to impress my Islamophobic Christian audience.

Muslim: Uh?

David: Woohoo, I just received $100 from Radical Moderate. That’s the 5th time he has donated this week!

Muslim: Dave, it turns out the terrorist was a Christian who is linked to your website.

David: Arrrrghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Nabeel, get me some oxygen!!! Arghhhhh.

Muslim: You’ve gone all purple and you are foaming at the mouth. I think you need more than oxygen. I told you Islamophobia was bad for you. For all we know, your lies and inflammatory rhetoric helped shape Anders Berhing Breivik into the psychotic and murderous terrorist he is today. Let this be a lesson for others.


Pam Geller sweating over Christian terrorist Anders Behring Breivik

The David Wood section

Tough questions for Christian apologists – unanswered

Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.com


Friday, 15 July 2011

David ‘Thighing’ Wood Flashback

Sometimes I wonder what drives David Wood – ringleader of Acts 17 Apologetics – to go to great lengths to ‘disprove’ Islam. David, if you can still remember we’re waiting for your and Sam Shamoun’s evidence to the mythical ‘thighing’ episode you’ve constantly aired on ABN Sat. Like your friend Walid Shoebat, we know you’re just full of hot air. Does it comfort you that you’re able to provide your daily bread and butter and so much more by miking your Christian audience? Christians wake up! These man’s lunacy knows no bounds!

Question for David Wood:
Would Jesus (PBUH) be proud of you for your gratuitous lies against an entire people?

Sunday, 10 July 2011

American Christian Bigots and the Female Afghan Parliament Fight


Why does hatred for Islam and Muslims (Islamophobia) force American Christian bigots to fall off their rockers? The same bigot who believes there are some American Christians within his community who attack other Christians in order to convert Muslims to Trinitarian Christianity (essentially the worship of a man, Prophet Jesus, pbuh)!

So a small fight breaks out within the Afghan parliament between a couple of females MPs and this American Christian bigot starts blaming Islam. I’m not kidding, he really starts to blame Islam for this!

Over last couple of decades American Christians have been dropping bombs on the heads of Muslim men, women and children in a merciless fashion (as well as shooting, raping and torturing) yet I don’t see Muslims blaming Christianity for the American Christian acts of butchery. These are acts of butchery which American Christians are still perpetrating – I guess their thirst for blood, specifically Muslim blood, has not been quenched. Why don’t we not supply these crazed American Christians with violent video games in the stead of real life weaponry – it would be a lot safer for the rest of the world.

Christians fighting each other

Maybe the Christian bigot being addressed believes these Christians (see video below) are fighting each other (Christians vs. Christians) to help their efforts to convert Muslims to Trinitarian Christianity (essentially the worship of a man, Prophet Jesus PBUH), after all, he does espouse some real nutty views.

Our advice to this American Christian bigot is to forget about promoting bigotry by commenting on a small fight in the puppet parliament of Afghanistan (puppetry controlled by none other than American Christians) and concentrate your mind on why ‘holy spirit inspired Christians’ are fighting each other and butchering Muslims. Perhaps you would like to explain why the two World Wars were Christian on Christian battles? In order to do so coherently, you need to get back on your rocker…

Christians fight other Christians for the control of a church

Armenian and Greek Orthodox Christians clashed for the control of the church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem’s Old City
To watch the continuation of this confrontation:

American Christian bigot Dave

As for the Christian bigot who was blaming Islam, here he is getting rebuked by a commentator:

Just had to comment on the latest addition to the bigot fest that is David Wood’s blog…

*Female MPs Get into Cat Fight on Floor of Afghan Parliament*

Of course Wood attributes this incident to Islam and those who follow prophet Muhammad (saws)…you know, the usual reductive and bigoted nonsense.

But perhaps he would like to explain these examples using the same criteria?


South Korea




Because democracy doesn’t change people’s hearts. It simply brings to light the attitudes of the majority…isn’t that right Dave?

[What’s the betting on the American fundy Christian Dave censoring such a comment…]

The David Wood section

What every Christian should know about the Bible

Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.com


Wednesday, 6 July 2011

Talk About Making Other Christian ‘Preachers’ Look Stupid…

A deceptive and peculiar Christian evangelist, named David Wood, is infamous for his gems of absurdity. Here’s another one of his nutty episodes:

First, Roger isn’t going after Terry Jones or Ruben Israel’s group. He harasses quiet, peaceful Christians who attempt to discuss the Gospel with Muslims. The shocking thing is that Roger actually considers himself to be a Christian. He’s from strange group that believes they can impress Muslims by attacking other Christians. Supposedly, after years of seeing people like Roger harass Christians (so the theory goes), Muslims will be attracted to Roger’s unspoken Gospel message and will embrace Christianity. This absurd mentality is becoming increasingly popular in Dearborn, where the only Christians who are truly welcome are the ones willing to throw other Christians under the bus

He thinks Christians are harassing other Christians to get Muslims to convert ot Christianity. What a nutty idea!

My message to this ‘evangelist’ is; stop, please just stop showing yourself up. That’s to say, stop spouting the garbage that passes for plausible ideas in your wacky anti-muslim evangelical circles.

Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.com


Saturday, 11 June 2011

Dearborn vs. Christian Bigots: Mayor John O’Reilly Owns A Bigot

It appears a group of Christian bigots will be looking to court controversy at this year’s Arab Festival (2011) in Dearborn (MI). One bigot (David Wood of Acts 17 Apologetics) will be taking ‘a group of friends’ with him. One suspects this will include the radical bigot who wants to use Iraq as a playground to fight Iran, a deceiver who makes up his own hadith literature and a perverted bigot who claims Muslims can have sex with animals. An obnoxious crew to say the least!

However, Dearborn citizens are fighting back. This fight back is spearheaded by Mayor John O’Reilly who appears to have been reading this very blog and learning about a bigot who has been thrusting a camera in the face of the Mayor of Dearborn. Well, the mayor was having none of it and unleashed a dose of truth in the direction of the bigot (David Wood)

Mayor John O’Reilly Puts the ‘Myth Maker’ of Acts 17 Apologetics in his place

Reading the David Wood section, Mayor John O’Reilly?

Hmmm, I suspect he Mayor has been reading about the lies perpetuated by Dave Wood on this very blog – the David Wood section has catalogued some of David Wood’s myth-making episodes.

Off his rocker or a compulsive liar?

Perhaps Mayor John O’Reilly was referring to David Wood’s outlandish claim of ‘Sharia in Dearborn’. David, I’m pretty sure you and your crew can drink and gamble yourselves silly in Dearborn. Where is the Sharia in Dearborn? It does not exist – it’s simply a product of this myth-maker’s mind.

Honor killings in Dearborn being covered up – a victim of gullibility or a liar?

David Wood has been deceptive with the issue of honor killings in the past as he was trying to convince Muslims honor killings were Islamic whilst censoring links to MUSLIM SCHOLARS who denounced honor killings. That’s why they call him Deceptive Dave.

However, Deceptive David Wood goes one step further this time by claiming Muslim honor killings in Dearborn are being covered up by Dearborn police officers! Yes, it sounds like the bloke is simply off his rocker. It get’s worse as this bloke actually claims Dearborn police officers told him this!

Did he not stop to think these officers (if they actually exist) were playing him for the fool by testing his gullibility – after all this is the same bloke who googled a sick sex hoax about Muslims and presented it as a fact to Christians. He will believe anything.

Dearborn Muslim rebukes Deceptive Dave on Honor Killings

I received this email from a Dearborn citizen (?) a while ago:

David Wood and Nabeel don’t want you to know this about Dearborn, MI. The Muslims in Dearborn are funny and like to have fun. They are not fanatics. Most of the Muslims in Dearborn are nominal Muslims. David claims honor killings are covered up by the Dearborn police. This is impossible for a number of reasons. First, the majority of Muslims in Dearborn are Shia from southern Lebanon. Who was the most respected Shiite cleric in Lebanon? It was Grand Ayathollah Fadlallah. He issued a fatwa against Honor Killings and a fatwa saying women have the right to defend themselves in domestic abuse. Lets grant David that the city of Dearborn is under control of Muslims (which is a lie that David likes to tell). Since the vast majority of Shia in Dearborn are from Lebanon where Ayatollah Fadlallah was looked on as an authoritative figure wouldn’t that in turn mean that the Shia in Dearborn would also be against honor killings? How would David Wood reconcile that? David claims in the 61st page of his lawsuit that the Police coverup Muslim honor killings in Dearborn. David is a liar.

Here are some comedy videos from Dearborn. You should watch them so you can learn about the real Dearborn. Not the distorted picture David likes to give it. You are welcome to post the information on your blog but please keep me anonymous. I do not want to be slandered by David Wood.



Common sense for Christians

Christians please employ a modicum of common sense when Christian bigots talk about Muslims. I’m simply asking you to question bigots who hijack the church in order to push themselves into the spotlight. Rest assured there will be some of this ilk at the Dearborn ArabFest 2011. Give them a wide birth – they don’t care about Christianity.

In the case of David Wood and his crew – they have not even bothered to answer genuine questions concerning the Bible. I guess their forte is the propaganda method or should I say the myth-making method…

Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.com

Become a Muslim if you love Jesus (p)

Sexism: Reason to change the Bible

Discover Islam

New Testament Discussed


Wednesday, 25 May 2011

Christian Bigots Copying Robert Spencer’s Distortions

I’m sorry to announce the Christian bigot, David Wood of Acts 17 Apologetics, is at it again – he is spreading LIES once again. Some folk just don’t know when to quit. Moreover, this bloke seems to be prattling on about sex an awful lot. I guess his ridiculous sex hoax has not shamed him. There’s no shaming the shameless!

Islamophobes out of control

David Wood is simply out of control with his unscholarly and deceptive musings. In this episode we catch old Dave plagiarising a whopper of a distortion from Robert Spencer and we note he deceptively quotes a Tafsir. For good measure we put up an interesting bible verse for Dave to wrap his interesting mindset around.

Lies and Video Tape: David Wood getting caught on video plagiarising LIES about sex from another misinformed bigot

If the video does not play please see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlxaGcOYW7M

Robert Spencer’s Fabrication

Seen as David is simply parroting from Robert Spencer’s book (p. 173) we might as well present Sheikh Zayed Moustafa’s short sharp shrift directed at Robert Spencer concerning the nutty lie our Christian friend is plagiarising:

On page 173, the author [Robert Spencer] again interprets a famous verse in the Holy Quran in a way that is totally different from all the interpretations of the verse in any Islamic reference. In the Holy Quran (our translation):

“Your women are a tilth for you, so perform your tilth in whichever way you want to…” 2:223

The verse addresses an incident when some of the companions of the Prophet asked him about a Jewish myth that if the intercourse happened in a certain position, the baby would be born cross-eyed. The verse later was revealed to indicate that as long as you’re having natural intercourse with your wife, then you can have that intercourse in any position you want together. The verse never meant by any stretch of the imagination in 1400 years of Islam that a man can do to his wife whatever he wants. Mr. Spencer’s interpretation is just that offensively absurd.

[The Lies about Muhammad – How you were Deceived into Islamophobia by Moustafa Zayed p337]

Why would the Christian bigot, Dave, selectively quote? Deception!

And here is the entire commentary from Tafsir Jalalayn which Deceptive Dave partially quotes in order to miss the context so he can build his latest nutty ‘sex position’ claim:

Your women are a tillage for you, that is, the place where you sow [the seeds of] your children; so come to your tillage, that is, the specified place, the front part, as, in whichever way, you wish, whether standing up, sitting down, lying down, from the front or the back: this was revealed in response to the Jews saying that if a person had vaginal intercourse with his wife from behind, the child would be born cross-eyed; and offer for your souls, righteous deeds, such as saying, ‘In the Name of God’ (bismillāh) when you commence intercourse; and fear God, in what He commands and prohibits; and know that you shall meet Him, at the Resurrection, where He will requite you according to your deeds; and give good tidings, of Paradise, to the believers, who feared Him.

The bigot missed the highlighted portion out. The most important portion as it offers explanation to scupper his lie. Wow, he is a deceptive piece of work!

Christian bigot’s view on the Bible…

Men are in charge of women and women must obey them according to the BIBLE. If David used the same mindset then he will have to claim men get to have sex with their wives in any position they fancy ACCORDING to the BIBLE.

In fact this argument can be used more vociferously against the Bible, so David the next time you want to talk sex positions please open up your Bible (if you are consistent) rather than throwing it under the bus.

I would ask him to read Ephesians 5:22-24 as wives must submit to their husbands in everything. Yes the word “everything” is used.

So who is allowed to have sex in any sexual position they want? The Christian husband [according to Dave Wood’s mindset]!

David Collecting Cash for Hatred + Deception – ABNSAT

Would you want the down right dishonest and unscholarly collecting cash for your organisation (ABN)? Eh, Bassim Gorial?

Invitation to Islam

Please look beyond the crazy lies that Islamophobes work assiduously and give Islam a chance. May Allah bless you further. Ameen.

Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.com


Monday, 25 April 2011

Sun Sets in a Pool of Slime – Hadith?

It appears as though Christian missionaries are confusing folk concerning the sun setting in a pool of slimy water via a dubious narration. IslamOnline clears the confusion as the narration is not thought to have come from the Prophet Muhammad (p):

The author claims that Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) also explained it in a literal sense. He quoted a hadith in which the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is reported as saying, “Do you know, Abu Dharr, where this sun sets?”

He answered, “God and His Messenger know better.”

Muhammad said, “It sets in a spring of slimy water.”

According to most authorities, this statement is not from Prophet Muhammad but it is attributed to Ka`b Al-Ahbar, a Jewish rabbi who converted to Islam and who reported this from the Torah, not from Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him).”

Islamophobic missionary (David Wood – Acts 17 Apologetics) is invited to look into real errors and contradictions:

IslamOnline’s clarification of the reference to Zul Qarnain in Quran 18:86 can be viewed here:


Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.com

Further reading:

Sexism: A reason to the change the Bible?

Numbers and the Bible do collide on more than one occasion

Discover Islam


Saturday, 19 March 2011

Moon God Exposed – Christian Missionary Hypocrisy and Deceit!

When we (Muslims) hear American Christian missionaries twitter on about the “moon-god being Allah”  we simply roll our eyes and feel pity for them as their co-religionists (other Christian missionaries) have armed them with LIES – obvious LIES!

Here we catch two Christian missionaries (Sam Shamoun and David Wood) presenting the moon god nonsense

Sam Shamoun and David Wood Disgrace ABNSat


If the video does not play, please see:

The moon god claim is a lie which was popularized by Dr Robert Morey and Jack Chick. There is no evidence for it, yet our Christian friends in America believe it as their leaders and co-missionaries teach this stuff. I guess, it is easier to lie about the opposition (the Muslims) than to meaningfully engage with them…

The word “Allah”

The word Allah is used by Arab Jews and CHRISTIANS too!

The crescent moon on some mosques?

Let it be said that the ‘moon’ symbol on some mosques and flags has nothing to do with Islam. There is no teaching within Islam that teaches the over-reverence of the moon or instructing Muslims to adopt it as a representative symbol. Early Muslims did not use the crescent (moon) for flags nor Mosques and did not have any symbol to represent them. This symbolism was introduced during the Ottoman Empire much later on and was adopted from a city they conquered; “It wasn’t until the Ottoman Empire that the crescent moon and star became affiliated with the Muslim world. When the Turks conquered Constantinople (Istanbul) in 1453, they adopted the city’s existing flag and symbol”


Missionaries are worrying

Christian missionaries are worrying as they have little regard for the truth, thus they can quite easily mislead folk. We should always double check what they say. Sadly, the biggest victims of Christian missionary deceit are lay Christians.

May Allah protect lay Christians and Muslims from Christian missionary deceptions, may Allah guide us all. Ameen.
Bible: Muslims are Blessed

Learn about Islam

Christian Missionary Pastor converts to Islam

Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.com


Thursday, 10 February 2011

Christian Missionaries and the 4 Witnesses for Rape Misconception

OK, it seems more and more people are realising it is a MISCONCEPTION to claim Muslim women require four witnesses to convict rapists.

Sadly, this misconception is being kept alive by Christian missionaries. We have just caught a Christian apologist (David Wood of Acts 17 Apologetics) propagating such falsehoods at Chris Arnzen’s (from Iron Sharpens Iron) conference for pastors.

Correcting this Christian’s falsehoods on rape, rapists and Islam

If this video does not play, please view:

Christian leaders being misled

Sadly Christian leaders were being taught this misconception as a fact by their speaker. Sadder still, they even thought their speaker was an expert on Islam. Quite why there are so many self-proclaimed “experts” out there in evangelical communities is beyond me.

Advice to Chris Arnzen: If you decide to hold another conference please hire qualified folk, a Muslim imam would be a good start – at least he will know a thing or two about Islam!

Advice to David Wood: Dave, please remove this misconception from your repertoire. Please gain knowledge from reputable sources rather than second rate websites/books. Please educate yourself via the link below. An apology to Chris Arnzen and the pastors at the conference would be highly encouraged. Cheers.

Advice to Muslims: Be wary of internet lies and misconceptions. If you hear a strange claim be sure to check it with EXPERTS. Sadly, there are too many non-muslims parading as experts on Islam whilst presenting disinformation.

The facts about Islam and rape


David Wood and his sex hoax

Learn about Islam

Pastor converts to Islam

Feedback: yahyasnow@hotmail.com


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s